Skip to Main Content
Using contingent valuation to value a noxious weeds control program: the effects of including an unsure response categoryAuthor(s): Patricia A. Champ; Anna Alberini; Ignacio Correas
Source: Ecological economics. 55(1): 47-60
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: Download Publication (158 KB)
DescriptionThe National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Contingent Valuation panel recommended that a response category be included along with the vote in favor and vote against options associated with a referendum contingent valuation question that allows individuals to express lack of a well defined opinion. However, the recommendation did not include guidance on how to analyze such responses. In this article, we describe the results of a carefully designed split sample experiment that allowed for comparison of a standard dichotomous-choice referendum treatment to a treatment that included the option of responding unsure to the contingent valuation question in addition to the standard vote in favor and vote against response categories. We are able to examine several options for dealing with the unsure responses and conclude that the unsure responses should be included in the value estimation as the respondents who choose this response category are distinct from respondents who choose the vote in favor and vote against response categories.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationChamp, Patricia A.; Alberini, Anna; Correas, Ignacio. 2005. Using contingent valuation to value a noxious weeds control program: the effects of including an unsure response category. Ecological economics. 55(1): 47-60
Keywordsnonmarket valuation, contingent valuation, willingness to pay, dichotomous-choice format, unsure responses, referendum
- Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: the case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation
- Gaining voter support for watershed protection
- A pseudo-sequential choice model for valuing multi-attribute environmental policies or programs in contingent valuation applications
XML: View XML