Skip to Main Content
Measuring the difference in mean willingness to pay when dichotomous choice contingent valuation responses are not independentAuthor(s): Gregory L. Poe; Michael P. Welsh; Patricia A. Champ
Source: Land economics. 73(2): 255-267
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: Download Publication (394 KB)
DescriptionDichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys frequently elicit multiple values in a single questionnaire. If individual responses are correlated across scenarios, the standard approach of estimating willingness to pay (WTP) functions independently for each scenario may result in biased estimates of the significance of the difference in mean WTP values. This paper applies an alternative bivariate probit approach that explicitly accounts for correlation across errors in the estimation of WTP and mean WTP. Using data from three separate dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies, this correlation is demonstrated to have an effect on the significance level of mean WTP difference tests.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationPoe, Gregory L.; Welsh, Michael P.; Champ, Patricia A. 1997. Measuring the difference in mean willingness to pay when dichotomous choice contingent valuation responses are not independent. Land economics. 73(2): 255-267
Keywordscontingent valuation, surveys, willingness to pay
- Which response format reveals the truth about donations to a public good?
- Does Question Format Matter? Valuing an Endangered Species
- Estimating consumer willingness to pay a price premium for Alaska secondary wood products.
XML: View XML