Skip to Main Content
Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goodsAuthor(s): Patricia A. Champ; Richard C. Bishop; Thomas C. Brown; Daniel W. McCollum
Source: Journal of environmental economics and management. 33(2): 151-162
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (138 KB)
DescriptionThis paper discusses an experiment in which the value for an unfamiliar environmental good, whose total value has a large nonuse component, is verified using a revealed-preference method. As we were unable to observe preferences via an incentive compatible mechanism, we collected voluntary contributions toward the provision of the good. We make a case for interpreting these contributions as a ‘‘theoretical lower bound’’ on the value of the public good and estimate the lower bound. We also investigate whether we can use contingent donation data to estimate such lower bounds on values. We used a follow-up to the contingent donation question about the respondent’s level of certainty with respect to her response to the contingent donation question. The results of this study suggest that use of the follow-up certainty question to differentiate respondents who would actually donate from those who would not is a promising approach to estimating a lower bound to Hicksian surplus measures.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationChamp, Patricia A.; Bishop, Richard C.; Brown, Thomas C.; McCollum, Daniel W. 1997. Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods. Journal of environmental economics and management. 33(2): 151-162
Keywordsdonations, contingent valuation, public goods, nonuse benefits
- Field testing existence values for riparian ecosystems
- A comparison of approaches to mitigate hypothetical bias
- Testing the effectiveness of certainty scales, cheap talk, and dissonance-minimization in reducing hypothetical bias in contingent valuation studies
XML: View XML