Skip to Main Content
Information bias in contingent valuation: effects of personal relevance, quality of information, and motivational orientationAuthor(s): Icek Ajzen; Thomas C. Brown; Lori H. Rosenthal
Source: Journal of environmental economics and management. 30(1): 43-57
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (137 KB)
DescriptionA laboratory experiment examined the potential for information bias in contingent valuation (CV). Consistent with the view that information about a public or private good can function as a persuasive communication, willingness to pay (WTP) was found to increase with the quality of arguments used to describe the good, especially under conditions of high personal relevance. Under low personal relevance, WTP for a publicbut not for a private. good was higher when an altruistic, as opposed to an individualistic, orientation was activated. It is concluded that the nature of the information provided in CV surveys can profoundly affect WTP estimates, and that subtle contextual cues can seriously bias these estimates under conditions of low personal relevance.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationAjzen, Icek; Brown, Thomas C.; Rosenthal, Lori H. 1996. Information bias in contingent valuation: effects of personal relevance, quality of information, and motivational orientation. Journal of environmental economics and management. 30(1): 43-57
Keywordscontingent valuation, willingness to pay, information bias
- Minority households’ willingness to pay for public and private wildfire risk reduction in Florida
- Accounting for respondent uncertainty to improve willingness-to-pay estimates
- Which response format reveals the truth about donations to a public good?
XML: View XML