Skip to Main Content
Due to a lapse in federal funding, this USDA website will not be actively updated. Once funding has been reestablished, online operations will continue.
How precise are monetary representations of environmental improvements?Author(s): Robin Gregory; Sarah Lichtenstein; Thomas C. Brown; George L. Peterson; Paul Slouic
Source: Land economics. 71(4): 462-473
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (310 KB)
DescriptionSubjects valued environmental goods using a response mode expressing willingness to pay as a multiplier or divider of a purported "budgetary unit." Hypothetical willingness to pay was found to be highly dependent on the size of the budgetary unit. Rejecting two other interpretations, we believe the results suggest that people's contingent values are only vaguely represented in monetary terms; any dollar amount within a broad range is considered an acceptable expression of value. Although the procedures differ from those of a typical contingent valuation suruey, the results demonstrate some of the difficulties in discovering precise monetary values for environmental resources.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationGregory, Robin; Lichtenstein, Sarah; Brown, Thomas C.; Peterson, George L.; Slouic, Paul. 1995. How precise are monetary representations of environmental improvements?. Land economics. 71(4): 462-473
Keywordscontingent valuation, willingness to pay, surveys, monetary values, environmental resources, precision
- Economic values, ethics, and ecosystem health
- Environmental equity and the conservation of unique ecosystems: an analysis of the distribution of benefits for protecting Southern Appalachian spruce-fir forests
- Use of dichotomous choice nonmarket methods to value the whooping crane resource
XML: View XML