Skip to Main Content
The values jury to aid natural resource decisionsAuthor(s): Thomas C. Brown; George L. Peterson; Bruce E. Tonn
Source: Land economics. 71(2): 250-260
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (332 KB)
DescriptionCongressional legislation emphasizes that public resource allocation should reflect the values citizens assign to those resources. Yet, information about assigned values and preferences of members of the public, including economic measures of value, required by decision makers is often incomplete or unavailable. Existing sources of information about the public's values, for use in resource allocation decisions and damage assessment, include existing markets, public surveys (including contingent valuation), and public involvement. Each of these sources has serious limitations.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationBrown, Thomas C.; Peterson, George L.; Tonn, Bruce E. 1995. The values jury to aid natural resource decisions. Land economics. 71(2): 250-260
Keywordsvalues, jury, surveys, contingent valuation
- An integrated approach to valuation and tradeoff analysis of ecosystem services for national forest decision-making
- Communicating about smoke from wildland fire: challenges and ways to address them
- Mapping landscape values: issues, challenges and lessons learned from fieldwork on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington
XML: View XML