Skip to Main Content
Past developments and future directions for the AHP in natural resourcesAuthor(s): Daniel L. Schmoldt; G.A. Mendoza; Jyrki Kangas
Source: Managing Forest Ecosystems: The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making. 3: 289-305.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (59.21 KB)
DescriptionThe analytic hierarchy process (AHP) possesses certain characteristics that make it a useful tool for natural resource decision making. The AHP’s capabilities include: participatory decision making, problem structuring and alternative development, group facilitation, consensus building, fairness, qualitative and quantitative information, conflict resolution, decision support, and preferences structuring. For each of these facilities, we describe how it is reflected in land management and then illustrate how it is addressed by the AHP. Based on this analysis and on the preceding chapters of the book, we offer some suggestions for extending the AHP in new directions, e.g. peer-to peer networking, site-specific management, forest management planning, statistical analyses, and software enhancements. The ability of the AHP to incorporate the human dimension (subjective preference) and to aid group decisions of choice are seen as the method’s most noteworthy features.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationSchmoldt, Daniel L.; Mendoza, G.A.; Kangas, Jyrki. 2001. Past developments and future directions for the AHP in natural resources. Managing Forest Ecosystems: The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making. 3: 289-305.
- Social, institutional, and psychological factors affecting wildfire incident decision making
- Policy capturing as a method of quantifying the determinants of landscape preference
- Modeling human-environmental systems
XML: View XML