Skip to Main Content
Autopsy of forestry ballot initiative: characterizing voter support for Oregon's measure 64.Author(s): Jeffrey D. Kline; Catriona Armstrong
Source: Journal of Forestry. 8 p
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
PDF: Download Publication (1.0 MB)
DescriptionOn November 3,1998, Oregon voters soundly rejected a ballot initiative intended to promote sustainable forestry practices and protect forest ecosystems by restricting clearcut logging and herbicide and pesticide use. We found that initiative support was greater in more urban counties composed of more educated residents earning higher incomes and with higher proportions of registered Democrats. Opposition was strongest in counties composed of higher proportions of forest industry employees and native-born Oregonians. Measure 64 voting data provide an opportunity to examine the potential relationship between the changing socioeconomic landscape and the public's perception of the role of forestry.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationKline, Jeffrey D.; Armstrong, Catriona. 2001. Autopsy of forestry ballot initiative: characterizing voter support for Oregon''s measure 64. Journal of Forestry. 8 p
KeywordsClearcutting, policy, sustainable forestry
- Landslide initiation, runout, and deposition within clearcuts and old-growth forests of Alaska.
- Blacks in space: land tenure and well-being in Perry County, Alabama
- Effects of Pine and Hardwood Basal Areas After Uneven-Aged Silvicultural Treatments on Wildlife Habitat
XML: View XML