Skip to Main Content
A comparison of the costs of forest service and contract fire crews in the Pacific Northwest.Author(s): Geoffrey H. Donovan
Source: Western Journal of Applied Science 20(4):233-239
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
PDF: View PDF (837 KB)
DescriptionRising wildfire suppression expenditures on public land in the United States have led to increased scrutiny of wildfire management practices. One area that has received particular attention is the Forest Service's increasing reliance on contract fire crews. Because a contract crew rate includes several costs that are not included in the wage costs of a Forest Service crew, it is difficult to determine if this increasing reliance on contract fire crews increases or decreases wildfire suppression costs. The full cost of 33 Forest Service type II fire crews dispatched during the 2003 fire season from five national forests in Oregon and Washington are estimated and compared with the cost of contract crews dispatched in the same region. Results suggest that if sufficient work is available to keep a Forest Service crew productively employed throughout a fire season, then the daily cost of a Forest Service type II crew is lower than the daily cost of a contract crew.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationDonovan, Geoffrey H. 2005. A comparison of the costs of forest service and contract fire crews in the Pacific Northwest. Western Journal of Applied Science 20(4):233-239
KeywordsType II fire crew, wildfire suppression, Oregon, Washington, Region 6, Forest Service, contract fire crews
- Comparing the costs of agency and contract fire crews.
- Determining the optimal mix of federal and contract fire crews: a case study from the Pacific Northwest.
- A simulation and optimisation procedure to model daily suppression resource transfers during a fire season in Colorado
XML: View XML