Skip to Main Content
Chapter 5 - Development of biophysical gradient layers for the LANDFIRE Prototype ProjectAuthor(s): Lisa Holsinger; Robert E. Keane; Russell Parsons; Eva Karau
Source: In: Rollins, Matthew G.; Frame, Christine K., tech. eds. 2006. The LANDFIRE Prototype Project: nationally consistent and locally relevant geospatial data for wildland fire management Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-175. Fort Collins: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. p. 99-122
Publication Series: General Technical Report (GTR)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
PDF: View PDF (1.5 MB)
DescriptionDistributions of plant species are generally continuous, gradually changing across landscapes and blending into each other due to the influence of, and interactions between, a complex array of biophysical gradients (Whittaker 1967; 1975). Key biophysical gradients for understanding vegetation distributions include moisture, temperature, evaporative demand, nutrient availability, and solar radiation. Models to predict plant community distributions across landscapes can be developed by identifying the unique set of biophysical gradients that drive the physiological responses of plant species across landscapes (Guissan and Zimmerman 2000). This method of incorporating information about ecological characteristics into analyses of vegetation distribution, termed gradient modeling, is a standard technique for describing ecosystem composition, structure, and function (Gosz 1992; Kessell 1976; Kessell 1979; Whittaker 1973) and has been applied extensively at varying scales, from local to regional (see Keane and others 2002 for a review of gradient modeling applications). The modeling process essentially involves developing empirical relationships between vegetation distributions and geospatial data describing biophysical gradients to enable extrapolation over space. Modeling accuracy becomes substantially improved by incorporating those biophysical gradients that directly affect vegetation dynamics such as temperature, light, and water (Austin 1980, 1985; Austin and Smith 1989; Franklin 1995). Recent efforts have further demonstrated that the accuracy of mapping vegetation and ecological characteristics using remote sensing techniques is greatly improved through the inclusion of biophysical gradient data as predictive variables (Franklin 1995; Keane and others 2002; Ohmann and Gregory 2002; Rollins and others 2004).
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationHolsinger, Lisa; Keane, Robert E.; Parsons, Russell; Karau, Eva. 2006. Chapter 5 - Development of biophysical gradient layers for the LANDFIRE Prototype Project. In: Rollins, Matthew G.; Frame, Christine K., tech. eds. 2006. The LANDFIRE Prototype Project: nationally consistent and locally relevant geospatial data for wildland fire management Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-175. Fort Collins: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. p. 99-122
Keywordsmapping wildland fuel, mapping fire regimes, Geographic Information Systems, GIS, remote sensing, fire ecology, fire behavior, wildland fire management
- Chapter 7 - Mapping potential vegetation type for the LANDFIRE Prototype Project
- Chapter 10 - Using simulation modeling to assess historical reference conditions for vegetation and fire regimes for the LANDFIRE Prototype Project
- Chapter 6 - Developing the LANDFIRE Vegetation and Biophysical Settings Map Unit Classifications for the LANDFIRE Prototype Project
XML: View XML