Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Keith M. ReynoldsPaul F. Hessburg
    Date: 2005
    Source: Forest Ecology and Management. 207: 263-278
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    PDF: View PDF  (2.5 MB)

    Description

    The historical patterns of Inland Northwest United States forests have been dramatically altered by a little more than two centuries of human settlement and land use. Spatial patterns of forest structural conditions, tree species composition, snags and down wood, and temporal variation in these patterns, have been altered to such an extent that the natural ebb and flow of terrestrial habitats and their linkages has been disrupted. Closely coupled with these changes, fire and other disturbance processes in most dry and many mesic forest types have also shifted, with a bias for increased severity and extent. Here, in the context of planning restoration of some semblance of historical vegetation pattern-disturbance process interactions, we briefly revisit why it is theoretically sound to estimate the range and variation in historical forest spatial patterns. We call these estimates of range and variation, reference conditions or reference variation (RV), and discuss how forest managers might use them when evaluating current landscape patterns to identify changes that may have important ecological implications. We term such evaluations, departure analyses, and we describe how departure analysis is implemented in a decision support system (DSS) for integrated landscape evaluation and restoration planning. The initial phase of the DSS uses logic-based modeling to evaluate existing patterns of forest vegetation in subwatersheds of one ecoregion against a corresponding envelope of historical reference conditions for the same region, thereby highlighting key departures. The secondary planning phase uses results from the analysis phase in a decision model to prioritize watersheds for possible management actions related to landscape restoration and maintenance. We conclude from our example that there are at least two advantages to a decision-support approach that treats evaluation and planning as distinct but integrated phases: (1) the overall decision process is rendered conceptually simpler and (2) practical considerations of efficacy and feasibility of management actions can be easily accommodated.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to pnw_pnwpubs@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Reynolds, Keith M.; Hessburg, Paul F. 2005. Decision support for integrated landscape evaluation and restoration planning. Forest Ecology and Management. 207: 263-278

    Keywords

    Criterion DecisionPlus, decision support, EMDS, historical range of variation, landscape evaluation, monitoring, NetWeaver, restoration, scenario planning

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/24894