Skip to Main Content
Comparison of logging residue from lump sum and log scale timber sales.Author(s): James O Howard; Donald J. DeMars
Source: Res. Pap. PNW-RP-337. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 12 p
Publication Series: Research Paper (RP)
Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
View PDF (618 KB)
DescriptionData from 1973 and 1980 logging residues studies were used to compare the volume of residue from lump sum and log scale timber sales. Covariance analysis was used to adjust the mean volume for each data set for potential variation resulting from differences in stand conditions. Mean residue volumes from the two sale types were significantly different at the 5-percent level for the 1973 data but were not significantly different for the 1980 data. These inconclusive findings suggest that the relative efficiency of changing sales procedures should be considered before further study is undertaken.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationHoward, James O; DeMars, Donald J. 1985. Comparison of logging residue from lump sum and log scale timber sales. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-337. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 12 p
Keywordsresidues, timber sales, wood utilization
- Review of the logging residue problem and its reduction through marketing practices.
- A logging residue "yield" table for Appalachian hardwoods
- Logging utilization in Oregon and Washington, 2011–2015
XML: View XML