Skip to Main Content
Comparison of five canopy cover estimation techniques in the western Oregon Cascades.Author(s): Anne C.S. Fiala; Steven L. Garman; Andrew N. Gray
Source: Forest Ecology and Management. 232: 188-197
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
PDF: Download Publication (1.0 MB)
DescriptionEstimates of forest canopy cover are widely used in forest research and management, yet methods used to quantify canopy cover and the estimates they provide vary greatly. Four commonly used ground-based techniques for estimating overstory cover - line-intercept, spherical densiometer, moosehorn, and hemispherical photography - and cover estimates generated from crown radii parameters of the western Cascades variant of the Forest Vegetation Simulator (FVS) were compared in five Douglas-fir/western hemlock structure types in western Oregon. Differences in cover estimates among the ground-based methods were not related to stand-structure type (p = 0.33). As expected, estimates of cover increased and stand-level variability decreased with increasing angle of view among techniques. However, the moosehorn provided the most conservative estimates of vertical-projection overstory cover. Regression equations are provided to permit conversion among canopy cover estimates made with the four ground-based techniques. These equations also provide a means for integrating cover data from studies that use different techniques, thus aiding in the ability to conduct synthetic research. Ground-based measures are recommended for specific objectives. Because the FVS-estimated cover levels were consistently lower and more variable than most of the ground-based estimates (by up to 44.17% on average), ground-based measures of canopy cover may be preferable when accuracy is an important objective.
- Visit PNW's Publication Request Page to request a hard copy of this publication.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationFiala, Anne C.S.; Garman, Steven L.; Gray, Andrew N. 2006. Comparison of five canopy cover estimation techniques in the western Oregon Cascades. Forest Ecology and Management. 232: 188-197
KeywordsOregon Cascades, canopy cover, line intercept, densiometer, moosehorn, hemispherical photography, FVS
- Testing a ground-based canopy model using the wind river canopy crane
- Geographic variability in lidar predictions of forest stand structure in the Pacific Northwest
- Making the little things count: modeling the development of understory trees in complex stands
XML: View XML