Skip to Main Content
Comparison of different stomatal conductance algorithms for ozone flux modellingAuthor(s): P. Buker; L.D. Emberson; M. R. Ashmore; H. M. Cambridge; C. M. Jacobs; W. J. Massman; J. Muller; N. Nikolov; K. Novak; E. Oksanen; M. Schaub; D. de la Torre
Source: Environmental Pollution. 146(3): 726-735.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
PDF: View PDF (307.61 KB)
DescriptionA multiplicative and a semi-mechanistic, BWB-type [Ball, J.T., Woodrow, I.E., Berry, J.A., 1987. A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In: Biggens, J. (Ed.), Progress in Photosynthesis Research, vol. IV. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 221-224.] algorithm for calculating stomatal conductance (gs) at the leaf level have been parameterised for two crop and two tree species to test their use in regional scale ozone deposition modelling. The algorithms were tested against measured, site-specific data for durum wheat, grapevine, beech and birch of different European provenances. A direct comparison of both algorithms showed a similar performance in predicting hourly means and daily time-courses of gs, whereas the multiplicative algorithm outperformed the BWB-type algorithm in modelling seasonal time-courses due to the inclusion of a phenology function. The re-parameterisation of the algorithms for local conditions in order to validate ozone deposition modelling on a European scale reveals the higher input requirements of the BWB-type algorithm as compared to the multiplicative algorithm because of the need of the former to model net photosynthesis (An).
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationBuker, P.; Emberson, L.D.; Ashmore, M. R.; Cambridge, H. M.; Jacobs, C. M.; Massman, W. J.; Muller, J.; Nikolov, N.; Novak, K.; Oksanen, E.; Schaub, M.; de la Torre, D. 2007. Comparison of different stomatal conductance algorithms for ozone flux modelling. Environmental Pollution. 146(3): 726-735.
Keywordsstomatal conductance, photosynthesis, modelling, parameterisation
- Comparison of different stomatal conductance algorithms for ozone flux modelling [Proceedings]
- Stomatal uptake of O3 in aspen and aspen-birch forests under free-air CO2 and O3 enrichment
- Interactive influences of ozone and climate on streamflow of forested watersheds
XML: View XML