Skip to Main Content
Defining the rift : U.S. economist examines the consequences of the differences in U.S. and Canadian stumpage valuationsAuthor(s): Henry Spelter
Source: Timber processing. (Apr. 2005): pages 24, 26.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (74 KB)
DescriptionIf America had Canada’s stumpage system, then there wouldn’t be much of a dispute. But the reality is there are two distinct models of timber valuation, and the core of America’s complaint vis-à-vis Canada is that, as a result, there is an asymmetry in the market where the two sides compete: on the one hand all producers have equal access under the same rules and standards to the U.S. lumber market, but at the timber supply level a different and exclusionary Canadian lumber pricing model provides wood at rates that disadvantage U.S. competitors. Canadians acknowledge that Canada has a competitive advantage in the way it prices timber, but claim it’s not a subsidy.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationSpelter, Henry. 2005. Defining the rift : U.S. economist examines the consequences of the differences in U.S. and Canadian stumpage valuations. Timber processing. (Apr. 2005): pages 24, 26.
KeywordsForest products, Canada, United States, statistics, timber, prices, timber, valuation, forest products industry, economic aspects, stumpage prices, timber sales, logs, mensuration, foreign trade regulation
- If the U.S. had Canada's stumpage system
- U.S. Policy and Canadian Lumber: Effects of the 1986 Memorandum of Understanding
- U.S. forest products module : a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment
XML: View XML