Skip to Main Content
Scaling-up the minimum requirements analysis for big wilderness issuesAuthor(s): David N. Cole
Source: International Journal of Wilderness 13(1): 8-12.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
PDF: View PDF (117.91 KB)
DescriptionThe concept of applying a "minimum requirements" analysis to decisions about administrative actions in wilderness in the United States has been around for a long time. It comes from Section 4(c) of the Wilderness Act of 1964, which states that "except as necessary to meet minimum requirements for the administration of the area for the purposes of this Act there shall be no temporary road, no use of motor vehicles, motorized equipment or motorboats, no landing of aircraft, no other form of mechanical transport, and no structure or installation within any such area." The concept interjects the notions of flexibility and compromise, suggesting that wilderness purposes might on occasion be best served by allowing generally prohibited uses. However, it is clear that such allowances should be the minimum necessary to achieve the purposes of the Wilderness Act.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationCole, David N. 2007. Scaling-up the minimum requirements analysis for big wilderness issues. International Journal of Wilderness 13(1): 8-12.
Keywordsminimum requirements" analysis, Wilderness Act of 1964, wilderness stewardship, hemlock, whitebark pine
- Monitoring hemlock woolly adelgid and assessing its impacts in the Delaware River Basin
- Variation in winter survival of the invasive hemlock woolly adelgid (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) across the eastern United States
- The matrix: A comparison of international wilderness laws
XML: View XML