Skip to Main Content
impacts of alternative farm policies on rural communitiesAuthor(s): J. Michael Bowker; James W. Richardson
Source: Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics: 35-46
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (1.01 MB)
DescriptionThe purpose of this study was to describe an LP/IO model for evaluating the economic impacts of alternative farm policies on rural communities and demonstrate its capabilities by analyzing the impacts of three farm policies on a rural community in Texas. Results indicate that in the noncrop sector, two groups of industries are most affected by farm policy. The first group relates to production directly (agricultural services, banking and credit, and nondurable manufacturing) and the second group relates to households (retail trade and services). Farm policies which reduce production but increase net returns cause losses for the first group while benefiting the second group. Both groups are made worse off by farm policies which reduce agricultural production and the value of output.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationBowker, J. Michael; Richardson, James W. 1989. impacts of alternative farm policies on rural communities. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics: 35-46
Keywordsfarm policy, rural communities, conservation reserve (CRP), mandatory supply controls, 1985 Farm Bill, LP/IO methods
- Socio-economic impacts of climate change on rural United States
- How to build multifunctional agricultural landscapes in the U.S corn belt: add perennials and partnerships
- The forest resources of New Hampshire
XML: View XML