Skip to Main Content
Choices of wilderness environments -- differences between real and hypothetical choice situationsAuthor(s): Jean T. Beaulieu; Richard Schreyer
Source: In: Stankey, George H.; McCool, Stephen F., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on recreation choice behavior; 1984 March 22-23; Missoula, MT. General Technical Report INT-184. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. p. 38-45
Publication Series: General Technical Report (GTR)
Station: Intermountain Forest Experiment Station
PDF: Download Publication (720 B)
DescriptionFactors considered most critical in selecting a specific wilderness environment in which to recreate are likely to vary depending upon the type of environment involved, the range and extent of experience of the recreationists, and the situational context of the decision (whether a real or a hypothetical decision was made). This study examines differences in factors considered in choosing a wilderness environment based upon whether the choice was an actual report of behavior or a hypothetical decision. A questionnaire requesting information concerning choices of wilderness areas in which to participate was administered to two groups. A sample of 325 recreationists were contacted on-site in wilderness areas in Utah and Wyoming and asked to report on why they had actually chosen that area. The second sample was a mail survey of Utah Wilderness Association members, and requested a hypothetical decision concerning a place in which to recreate and the factors used to make that decision. Responses were analyzed for the two sets in terms of the most important factor cited in making the choice, the degree of specificity of the most important factor, the total number of factors considered important in making the choice, and the combination of attributes considered important. In all cases, significant differences were noted.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationBeaulieu, Jean T.; Schreyer, Richard. 1985. Choices of wilderness environments -- differences between real and hypothetical choice situations. In: Stankey, George H.; McCool, Stephen F., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on recreation choice behavior; 1984 March 22-23; Missoula, MT. General Technical Report INT-184. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. p. 38-45
Keywordsrecreation choice behavior, wilderness environments, recreationists
- Why here and not there: The conditional nature of recreation choice
- Balancing tradeoffs in the Denali Wilderness: an expanded approach to normative research using stated choice analysis
- Methodology for studying recreation choice behavior with emphasis on grounded inquiry
XML: View XML