Skip to Main Content
Consequences of ignoring geologic variation in evaluating grazing impactsAuthor(s): Jonathan W. Long; Alvin L. Medina
Source: Rangeland ecology & management. 59(4): 373–382
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (353 KB)
DescriptionThe geologic diversity of landforms in the Southwest complicates efforts to evaluate impacts of land uses such as livestock grazing. We examined a research study that evaluated relationships between trout biomass and stream habitat in the White Mountains of east-central Arizona. That study interpreted results of stepwise regressions and a nonparametric test of “grazed and ungrazed meadow reaches” as evidence that livestock grazing was the most important factor to consider in the recovery of the Apache trout (Oncorhynchus apache Miller). That study had assumed that geologic variation was insignificant in the study area. However, lithologic and topographic differences between the felsic slopes of Mount Baldy and adjacent mafic plateaus influence many attributes of trout habitat. We tested the robustness of the earlier study by using its dataset and its method of stepwise regression, but with the addition of a variable representing geologic variation. The results suggested that geology was a highly significant predictor of trout biomass (P<0.0001), whereas bank damage by ungulates was not a useful predictor of residual variation in trout biomass after accounting for geology (r-2=0.015, P=0.290). However, the associations between natural variation and land use impacts in this spatial dataset confound attempts to make inferences concerning effects of livestock grazing upon trout. Despite fundamental problems in the analysis, the results of the earlier study were repeatedly cited in scientific literature and debates about grazing management. To fairly decipher relationships between ecological production and livestock grazing in diverse landscapes requires temporal studies with reliable methodologies and proper controls for landscape variation. Ignoring geologic variation has the potential to mislead conservation policies by inappropriately implicating land use, by undervaluing inherently favorable habitats, and by inflating expectations for inherently less favorable habitats.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationLong, Jonathan W.; Medina, Alvin L. 2006. Consequences of ignoring geologic variation in evaluating grazing impacts. Rangeland ecology & management. 59(4): 373–382
KeywordsOncorhynchus apache, Apache trout, fish habitat, riparian areas, livestock grazing, landscape analysis, lithology
- Geologic influences on Apache trout habitat in the White Mountains of Arizona
- Restoration of Soldier Spring: an isolated habitat for native Apache trout
- Biology and management of threatened and endangered western trouts
XML: View XML