Skip to Main Content
An evaluation of percentile and maximum likelihood estimators of weibull paremetersAuthor(s): Stanley J. Zarnoch; Tommy R. Dell
Source: Forest Sci., Vol. 31(1): 260-268
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (117 KB)
DescriptionTwo methods of estimating the three-parameter Weibull distribution were evaluated by computer simulation and field data comparison. Maximum likelihood estimators (MLB) with bias correction were calculated with the computer routine FITTER (Bailey 1974); percentile estimators (PCT) were those proposed by Zanakis (1979). The MLB estimators had superior smaller bias and mean square error but larger variance than the PCT estimators. The MLB bias correction in FITTER increased the bias of parameter c, suggesting that for the three-parameter Weibull, the MLB estimators should be used without the correction. Comparisons of predicted percentages indicate that either MLB or PCT estimators,which are simpler to use, can model pine plantations equally well.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationZarnoch, Stanley J.; Dell, Tommy R. 1985. An evaluation of percentile and maximum likelihood estimators of weibull paremeters. Forest Sci., Vol. 31(1): 260-268
KeywordsFITTER, diameter distribution, Weibull distribution, growth and yield, modeling, estimation
- Small Sample Properties of Asymptotically Efficient Estimators of the Parameters of a Bivariate Gaussian–Weibull Distribution
- Confidence intervals for predicting lumber strength properties based on ratios of percentiles from two Weibull populations.
- Estimating erosion risk on forest lands using improved methods of discriminant analysis
XML: View XML