Skip to Main Content
Modification of VanWagner's canopy fire propagation modelAuthor(s): James Dickinson; Andrew Robinson; Richy Harrod; Paul Gessler; Alistair Smith
Source: In: Butler, Bret W.; Cook, Wayne, comps. The fire environment--innovations, management, and policy; conference proceedings. 26-30 March 2007; Destin, FL. Proceedings RMRS-P-46CD. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. CD-ROM. p. 83-96
Publication Series: Proceedings (P)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
PDF: View PDF (830 B)
DescriptionThe conditions necessary for the combustion of canopy fuels are not well known but are assumed to be highly influenced by the volume through which the canopy fuels are dispersed, known as canopy bulk density (CBD). Propagating crown fire is defined as a continuous wall of flame from the bottom to the top of the canopy, implying crown fire propagation is actually independent of the vertical fuel distribution. We hypothesize that all foliar canopy fuel is available for the propagation of canopy fire. Therefore, we focus our effort on simplifying Van Wagner’s (1977) canopy fire propagation model to accept a canopy fuel metric that uses only foliar biomass per unit area (FBA) rather than the more complex and commonly used CBD. The multiplication of leaf area index (LAI) and the specific leaf area (SLA) of a given tree species results in FBA, making FBA easily related back to ecologically meaningful terms at a range of spatial scales. A variety of instruments can be used to estimate LAI with high accuracy, and SLA values have been published for many species found in fire prone forests of the West. Alternatively, allometric equations can be used to compute FBA using individual tree-level measurements. Using Van Wagner’s (1977) data we modify his propagation model and successfully match his published results. In addition, we use Forest Inventory and Analysis data from northern Idaho to compare the critical rate of spread (cROS) predicted by the modified model (using FBA) with the predictions of the original model (using CBD). We find that the two models are statistically equivalent (α = 0.10).
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationDickinson, James; Robinson, Andrew; Harrod, Richy; Gessler, Paul; Smith, Alistair. 2007. Modification of VanWagner''s canopy fire propagation model. In: Butler, Bret W.; Cook, Wayne, comps. The fire environment--innovations, management, and policy; conference proceedings. 26-30 March 2007; Destin, FL. Proceedings RMRS-P-46CD. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. CD-ROM. p. 83-96
Keywordswildland fire management, canopy fuels, canopy bulk density, CBD, Van Wagner’s canopy fire propagation model
- Chapter 2: Fire and Fuels Extension: Model description
- Influence of Crown Biomass Estimators and Distribution on Canopy Fuel Characteristics in Ponderosa Pine Stands of the Black Hills
- Estimating forest canopy bulk density using six indirect methods
XML: View XML