Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Chelcy R. FordRobert M. Hubbard; Brian D. Kloeppel; James M. Vose
    Date: 2007
    Source: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 145: 176-185
    Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
    PDF: Download Publication  (0.97 MB)


    Many researchers are using sap flux to estimate tree-level transpiration, and to scale to stand- and catchment-level transpiration; yet studies evaluating the comparability of sap flux-based estimates of transpiration (E) with alternative methods for estimating Et at this spatial scale are rare. Our ability to accurately scale from the probe to the tree to the watershed has not yet been demonstrated, nor do we know the relative impact of the main sources of variability on our scaled estimates. Accounting for the variability in the radial distribution of sap flux within the sapwood, the variability of transpiration among trees and between plots within the catchment, and the variability in stand density, sapwood area, and leaf area are critical for making landscape inferences about transpiration.

    During 2004 and 2005, we continuously monitored 40 trees in three plots within a 13.5-ha gauged watershed comprising a 50- year-old eastern white pine plantation within the Coweeta Basin in western North Carolina, USA. We scaled sap flux-based estimates of stand transpiration (Et) and surface area-based estimates of stand interception (Ei) to the catchment and compared these with water balance estimates of evapotranspiration (E, precipitation minus runoff, P - Ro).

    For both years, the sum of sap flux scaled Et and Ei were 14 and 7% lower than evapotranspiration estimated from P - Ro. Our results show that a considerable amount of variation exists at each scaling step encountered; however, a simple scaling exercise revealed that omitting among plot variation affected the sap flux scaled E, estimate by 48%. Thus, the largest source of variability in scaling to the landscape was landscape variation in stand density and sapwood area.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Ford, Chelcy R.; Hubbard, Robert M.; Kloeppel, Brian D.; Vose, James M. 2007. A comparison of sap flux-based evapotranspiration estimates with catchment-scale water balance. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 145: 176-185


    scaling, sap flux density, sapwood area, transpiration, validation

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page