Skip to Main Content
Is a "hands-off" approach appropriate for red-cockaded woodpecker conservation in twenty-first-century landscapes?Author(s): Daniel Saenz; Richard N. Conner; D. Craig Rudolph; R. Todd Engstrom
Source: Wildlife Society Bulletin. 29(3): 956-966
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (1.5 MB)
DescriptionThe endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) is well adapted to fire-maintained pine ecosystems of the Southeastern United States. Management practices vary greatly among land ownerships. In some wilderness areas and state parks, a "no management" policy has eliminated use of prescribed fire, artificial cavities, and woodpecker translocation, tools that have proved effective elsewhere in recovering woodpecker populations. We compared forests with essentially "no management" to actively managed forests of similar tree ages and similar red-cockaded woodpecker population demographics. We also compared sites that had received no management in the past to the same sites after management. In every case, populations in forests that did not use state of the art management for woodpeckers declined severely compared to those in managed forests. Because managed forests typically used all available management techniques concurrently, it was not possible to separate and rank effectiveness of specific management activities. One exception was the Wade Tract in Georgia, where prescribed fire was the primary activity for herbaceous layer and hardwood management in a high density, stable woodpecker population. Wilderness areas, which are intended to be pristine places that preserve biodiversity, are losing red-cockaded woodpeckers, a keystone species in the ecosystem, at an alarming rate. Collectively, 9 groups of red cockaded woodpeckers were present in 4 wilderness areas in Texas national forests in 1983. At the close of the millennium, only one woodpecker group remained and its continued existence is unlikely without management. The very fragmented features of present-day landscapes and intervention by humans impair the effectiveness of natural disturbance processes, primarily growing-season fire, that historically produced and maintained open pine savannas with grass-forb herbaceous layers in the pre Columbian forests of the southeastern U.S.; therefore, active management must be used if the red-cockaded woodpecker is to persist.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationSaenz, Daniel; Conner, Richard N.; Rudolph, D. Craig; Engstrom, R. Todd. 2001. Is a "hands-off" approach appropriate for red-cockaded woodpecker conservation in twenty-first-century landscapes? Wildlife Society Bulletin. 29(3): 956-966.
- Competition for red-cockaded woodpecker roost and nest cavities: effects of resin age and entrance diameter
- Habitat use and avoidance by foraging red-cockaded woodpeckers in east Texas
- Red-cockaded woodpecker foraging behavior in relation to midstory vegetation
XML: View XML