Skip to Main Content
Seasonal habitat associations of the wolverine in central IdahoAuthor(s): Jeffrey P. Copeland; James M. Peek; Craig R. Groves; Wayne E. Melquist; Kevin S. Mckelvey; Gregory W. McDaniel; Clinton D. Long; Charles E. Harris
Source: Journal of Wildlife Management. 71(7): 2201-2212.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (705 B)
DescriptionAlthough understanding habitat relationships remains fundamental to guiding wildlife management, these basic prerequisites remain vague and largely unstudied for the wolverine. Currently, a study of wolverine ecology conducted in Montana, USA, in the 1970s is the sole source of information on habitat requirements of wolverines in the conterminous United States. The Montana study and studies conducted in Canada and Alaska report varying degrees of seasonal differences in wolverine habitat use. This article provides an empirical assessment of seasonal wolverine habitat use by 15 wolverines (Gulo gulo) radiotracked in central Idaho, USA, in 1992-1996. We controlled for radiotelemetry error by describing the probability of each location being in a habitat cover type, producing a vector of cover type probabilities suited for resource selection analysis within a logistic regression framework. We identified variables that were important to presence of wolverines based on their strength (significance) and consistency (variability in coeff. sign) across all possible logistic regression models containing 9 habitat cover types and 3 topographic variables. We selected seasonal habitat models that incorporated those variables that were strong and consistent, producing a subset of potential models. We then ranked the models in this subset based on Akaike's Information Criterion and goodness-of-fit. Wolverines used modestly higher elevations in summer versus winter, and they shifted use of cover types from whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis) in summer to lower elevation Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziezii) and lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) communities in winter. Elevation explained use of habitat better than any other variable in both summer and winter. Grass and shrub habitats and slope also had explanatory power. Wolverines preferred northerly aspects, had no attraction to or avoidance of trails during summer, and avoided roads and ungulate winter range. These findings improve our understanding of wolverine presence by demonstrating the importance of high-elevation subalpine habitats to central Idaho wolverines.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationCopeland, Jeffrey P.; Peek, James M.; Groves, Craig R.; Melquist, Wayne E.; Mckelvey, Kevin S.; McDaniel, Gregory W.; Long, Clinton D.; Harris, Charles E. 2007. Seasonal habitat associations of the wolverine in central Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management. 71(7): 2201-2212.
Keywordsall-possible models, goodness-of-fit, Gulo gulo, habitat, Idaho, logistic regression, selection index, telemetry error, wolverine
- Chapter 4: Fishers and American martens
- Test of the prey-base hypothesis to explain use of red squirrel midden sites by American martens
- The bioclimatic envelope of the wolverine (Gulo gulo): do climatic constraints limit its geographic distribution?
XML: View XML