Skip to Main Content
Recovery of stream ecosystem metabolism from historical agricultureAuthor(s): M.E. McTammany; E.F. Benfield; J.R. Webster
Source: J.N. Am. Benthol. Soc., Vol. 26(3): 532-545
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
PDF: Download Publication (2.71 MB)
DescriptionAgriculture has influenced southern Appalachian streams for centuries, but recent socioeconomic trends in the region have led to extensive reforestation agricultural land. Stream ecosystem metabolism might recover from agricultural influence as watersheds undergo reforestation, particularly when shade from terrestrial vegetation is restored. We determined historical (1950) and current (1993) forest cover in 2nd - and erd -order watersheds in 4 counties of the southern Appalachians using geographic information system. Streams were placed into landuse categories based on % forested land cover in watersheds and riparian zones. Categories included forested (FOR; < 98% forested) and 3 levels of agriculture (AG; ranging from 95% forest to < 60% forest) with no change in % forest over the past 50y, and 2 levels of recovery from agriculture (REC) indicated by reforestation after land abandonment. We selected 3 streams from each category and measured gross primary production (GPP) and 24h respiration (R24) using a 2-station diurnal O2 change technique and gas releases to determine recreation rates. We calculated net ecosystem production (NEP) and the ratio of GPP to Ra (P/R) to compare ecosystem energetics among landuse categories. We measured nutrient concentrations, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), temperature (degree-days), suspended particle concentrations, and benthic algae (chlorophyll a and ash-free dry mass) to determine if these factors were affected by current or historical agriculture and were correlated with metabolism. Concentrations of inorganic nutrients, PAR, degree-days, suspended solids, and benthic algae were significantly higher in AG streams than in FOR streams. Nutrient and suspended solid concentrations also were higher in REC than in FOR streams. Nutrient and suspended solid concentrations also were higher in REC than in FOR streams, but PAR, degree-days, and benthic algae were similar in REC and FOR streams. GPP varied from <0.1 g O2 m-2d-1 in FOR streams to 1.0 g O2 M-2d-1 in AG streams. GPP was similar in REC and FOR streams, suggestion that shading caused by reforestation might reduce GPP to pre-agricultural levels. R24 was 4 to 20x greater than GPP in all stream types, resulting in highly negative NEP. NEP was less negative in AG streams than in FOR and REC streams. Negative NEP and P/R consistently <1 could have been caused by allochthonous organic matter from remnant forested degree-days, and algal biomass, suggesting that reduced light limited primary production in the streams studied. R24 was positively correlated with nutrient concentrations. Shading caused by reforestation appears to be an important mechanism by which stream metabolism recovers from historical agriculture. Our results provide support for stream restoration efforts focused on developing and maintaining streamside forests.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationMcTammany, M.E.; Benfield, E.F.; Webster, J.R. 2007. Recovery of stream ecosystem metabolism from historical agriculture. J.N. Am. Benthol. Soc., Vol. 26(3): 532-545
Keywordsprimary production, respiration, light, nutrients, algae, agriculture, resilience, southern Appalachians
- Inter-regional comparison of land-use effects on stream metabolism
- Are leaf breakdown rates a useful measure of stream integrity along an agricultural landuse gradient?
- Effects of agriculture on wood breakdown and microbial biofilm respiration in southern Appalachian streams
XML: View XML