Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): T.Z. Ye; K.J.S. Jayawickrama; G.R. Johnson
    Date: 2006
    Source: Tree Genetics and Genomes. 3: 319-328
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    PDF: View PDF  (524 KB)

    Description

    Using computer simulation, we evaluated the impact of using first-generation information to increase selection efficiency in a second-generation breeding program. Selection efficiency was compared in terms of increase in rank correlation between estimated and true breeding values (i.e., ranking accuracy), reduction in coefficient of variation of correlation coefficients (i.e., ranking reliability), and increase in realized gain, with best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). The test populations were generated with varying parameters: selection strategy (forward vs. backward selection of parents); number of parents (24 to 96); number of crosses per parent (1 to 8); heritability (0.05 to 0.35); ratio of dominance to additive variance (0 to 3); ratio of additive-by-site to additive variance (0 to 3); and ratio of dominance-by-site to additive variance (0 to 3). The two selection strategies gave distinct results. When parents of the second-generation crosses had been selected via backward selection, adding first-generation information markedly increased selection efficiency. Conversely, when parents had been selected via forward selection, first-generation information provided little increase in efficiency. The amount of increase depended more on heritabilities in both generations and less on dominance and genotype-by-environment effects. Including first-generation information helped more when there were many parents and few crosses per parent in the second generation. Only in the case of extremely low first-generation heritabilities was there no benefit to adding first-generation information in terms of improved ranking reliability and accuracy.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to pnw_pnwpubs@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Ye, T.Z.; Jayawickrama, K.J.S.; Johnson, G.R. 2006. Efficiency of including first-generation information in second-generation ranking and selection: results of computer simulation. Tree Genetics and Genomes. 3: 319-328

    Keywords

    Stochastic simulation, selection efficiency, BLUP, first-generation information, second-generation selection

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/29349