Skip to Main Content
Historical review of termite activity at Forest Service termiticide test sites from 1971 to 2004Author(s): J.E. Mulrooney; T.L. Wagner; T.G. Shelton; C.J. Peterson; P.D. Gerard
Source: J. Econ. Entomol., Vol. 100(2): 488-494
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: Download Publication (248 KB)
DescriptionThe U.S. Forest Service has a long history of providing termiticide efficacy data used for product registration and labeling. Four primary test sites (Arizona and Florida, Mississippi, and South Carolina [hereafter southeast]) have been used for this purpose. Various parameters of termite attack at water-only control plots were examined in this study to assess the relative pressures of termites at each site. Termiticide studies installed between 1971 and 2001 by using ground board (GB) and concrete slab (CS) test methods were included. GB control plots were attacked 85% of the time in the southeast, about twice the rate observed in Arizona (43%). CS plots were attacked 59Ð70% of the time in the southeast, significantly higher than in Arizona (43%). Termites were slower to initiate attack at control plots in Arizona compared with the southeast, and they were up to twice as slow at CS controls. Once initial attack began,CS plots were reattacked at higher percentages in the southeast (89Ð90%) than in Arizona (67%). reattack at CS plots ranged from 65% in Arizona and South Carolina to 76% in Mississippi. Termites caused less damage to wooden blocks in control plots in Arizona than the southeast. Attack rates at controls generally declined during the 1990s, but these rates have rebounded since 2000, except at CS plots in Arizona and South Carolina. Statistical analysis of attacks at plots treated with chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin, fenvalerate, and permethrin also was undertaken. Time to initial termite attack (failure) of the organophosphate chlorpyrifos was generally shorter in Arizona than in the southeast, whereas time to initial attack in plots treated with one of three pyrethroids (cypermethrin, fenvalerate, and permethrin) was generally longer in Arizona.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationMulrooney, J.E.; Wagner, T.L.; Shelton, T.G.; Peterson, C.J.; Gerard, P.D. 2007. Historical review of termite activity at Forest Service termiticide test sites from 1971 to 2004. J. Econ. Entomol., Vol. 100(2): 488-494
Keywordstermite, termiticide efficacy testing, termite attack and damage
- Persistence of termiticides in soil inside and outside miniature concrete foundations (Isoptera)
- Termite Control: Results of Testing at the U.S. Forest Service
- U.S. Forest Service termiticide tests
XML: View XML