Skip to Main Content
Anatomy of the academy: Dissecting the past, resecting the futureAuthor(s): Daniel R. Williams
Source: Journal of Leisure Research. 32(1): 180-185.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (295 B)
DescriptionOffered the opportunity to write about whatever topic moves me, I decided my millennial issue is to examine the place of leisure studies in higher education. Having recently left the academy after putting in 15 years at three different universities (most recently, the University of Illinois), affords me certain liberty to explore my thoughts on the future of the field of leisure studies. Within each of my former institutions, I found myself struggling, along with my colleagues, to articulate a vision of leisure studies suited to that institution and the place of leisure studies within it. The challenge that consistently plagued us was trying to adapt our program to what I found to be very rigid, narrow, and antiquated accreditation standards while simultaneously strengthening our position on campus at a time when administrators were looking for programs to eliminate without harming the overall university.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationWilliams, Daniel R. 2000. Anatomy of the academy: Dissecting the past, resecting the future. Journal of Leisure Research. 32(1): 180-185.
Keywordsleisure studies, higher education, accreditation, academic program development
- New relationships with wilderness
- Editor's message: Student involvement
- Climate change and the future of freshwater fisheries
XML: View XML