Skip to Main Content
The quandaries and promise of risk management: a scientist's perspective on integration of science and management.Author(s): B.G. Marcot
Source: The George Wright Forum. 24(2): 30-35
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
PDF: View PDF (387 KB)
DescriptionThis paper briefly lists constraints and problems of traditional approaches to natural resource risk analysis and risk management. Such problems include disparate definitions of risk, multiple and conflicting objectives and decisions, conflicting interpretations of uncertainty, and failure of articulating decision criteria, risk attitudes, modeling assumptions, and weaknesses. Solving these problems can entail use of more recent decision-aiding tools and methods for multi-objective decisionmaking, use of methods for rigorously extracting knowledge from multiple experts, and decomposing complex problems into tractable subparts.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationMarcot, B.G. 2007. The quandaries and promise of risk management: a scientist''s perspective on integration of science and management. The George Wright Forum. 24(2): 30-35
KeywordsDecision analysis, risk analysis, risk management, modeling
- Forests at risk: integrating risk science into fuel management strategies.
- Accepting uncertainty, assessing risk: decision quality in managing wildfire, forest resource values, and new technology
- Informed multi-objective decision-making in environmental management using Pareto optimality
XML: View XML