Skip to Main Content
Effects of water suspension and wet-dry cycling on fertility of Douglas-fir pollen.Author(s): Donald L. Copes; Nan C. Vance
Source: Res. Note PNW-RN-527. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 9 p
Publication Series: Research Note (RN)
Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
Download Publication (82 KB)
DescriptionStudies were made to determine how long Douglas-fir pollen remains viable after suspension in cool water form 0 to 34 days. Linear regression analysis of in vivo and in vitro tests indicated that filled seed efficiency and pollen viability, respectively, decreased about 3 percent per day. The relation may have been nonlinear the first 6 days, as little decrease occurred during that time. An in vitro test of the effect of none, one, or two drying cycles on previously wetted pollens revealed a great decrease in pollen viability after just one drying cycle. The in vivo test of 1-, 2-, and 3-percent pollen suspensions showed that the 3-percent suspension resulted in 15 percent greater filled seed efficiency than the 2-percent and 57 percent greater than the 1-percent suspension.
- Visit PNW's Publication Request Page to request a hard copy of this publication.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationCopes, Donald L.; Vance, Nan C. 2000. Effects of water suspension and wet-dry cycling on fertility of Douglas-fir pollen. Res. Note PNW-RN-527. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 9 p
KeywordsSupplemental mass pollination, seed orchard, flowering, reproduction, filled seed efficiency, Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii
- Vacuum collection of Douglas-fir pollen for supplemental mass pollinations.
- Pine pollens frozen five years produce seed
- Potential carry-over of seeds from 11 common shrub and vine competitors of loblolly and shortleaf pines
XML: View XML