Skip to Main Content
Modeling willingness to pay for land conservation easements: treatment of zero and protest bids and application and policy implicationsAuthor(s): Seong-Hoon Cho; Steven T. Yen; J. Michael Bowker; David H. Newman
Source: Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 40(1): 267-285
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (2.20 MB)
DescriptionThis study compares an ordered probit model and a Tobit model with selection to take into account both true zero and protest zero bids while estimating the willingness to pay (WTP) for conservation easements in Macon County, NC. By comparing the two models, the ordered/Unordered selection issue of the protest responses is analyzed to demonstrate how the treatment of protest responses can significantly influence WTP models. Both models consistently show that income and knowledge are positive and significant factors, while distance to poorer quality streams and duration of residency are negative and significant factors on WTP.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationCho, Seong-Hoon; Yen, Steven T.; Bowker, J. Michael; Newman, David H. 2008. Modeling willingness to pay for land conservation easements: treatment of zero and protest bids and application and policy implications. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 40(1): 267-285
Keywordscensored dependent variable, conservation easement, protest bid, sample selection, WTP
- Does Question Format Matter? Valuing an Endangered Species
- Estimating the Economic Value of Lethal Versus Nonlethal Deer Control in Suburban Communities
- Vegetation-environment relationships in zero-order basins in coastal Oregon.
XML: View XML