Skip to Main Content
In my experience: quality control of symposia and their published proceedingsAuthor(s): J. Michael Scott; C. John Ralph
Source: Wildlife Society Bulletin, 16(1):68-74
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (224 KB)
DescriptionThe lack of quality in symposia proceedings has recently been criticized by Bart and Anderson (1981). Their criticisms elicited 2 defenses of publishing symposia proceedings (Ca- pen 1982, Finch et al. 1982). These authors offered excellent suggestions for improving the quality of published proceedings: review papers before acceptance; use outside reviewers; request revisions; reject low quality papers; establish a strong organizing committee; and recognize proceedings as citable works. In this paper we build on these suggestions and offer additional guidelines for improving the quality of symposia and their published proceedings.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationScott, J. Michael; Ralph, C. John. 1988. In my experience: quality control of symposia and their published proceedings. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 16(1):68-74
- Comments in defense of symposia proceedings: Response to Bart and Anderson
- Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood—50 Years of Research: International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium Series
- Soils and nutrition: A forest nursery perspective
XML: View XML