Skip to Main Content
A statistical test to show negligible trendAuthor(s): Philip M. Dixon; Joseph H.K. Pechmann
Source: Ecology, 86(7), 2005, pp. 1751?1756
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (90 KB)
DescriptionThe usual statistical tests of trend are inappropriate for demonstrating the absence of trend. This is because failure to reject the null hypothesis of no trend does not prove that null hypothesis. The appropriate statistical method is based on an equivalence test. The null hypothesis is that the trend is not zero, i.e., outside an a priori specified equivalence region defining trends that are considered to be negligible. This null hypothesis can be tested with two one-sided tests. A proposed equivalence region for trends in population size is a log-linear regression slope of (20.0346, 0.0346). This corresponds to a half-life or doubling time of 20 years for population size. A less conservative region is (20.0693, 0.0693), which corresponds to a halving or doubling time of 10 years. The approach is illustrated with data on four amphibian populations; one provides significant evidence of no trend.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationDixon, Philip M.; Pechmann, Joseph H.K. 2005. A statistical test to show negligible trend. Ecology, 86(7), 2005, pp. 1751?1756
KeywordsAmbystoma, amphibian decline, Desmognathus, equivalence tests, population trends, statistical power, testing for no effect
- Discerning responses of down wood and understory vegetation abundance to riparian buffer width and thinning treatments: an equivalence-inequivalence approach
- Testing for change in structural elements of forest inventories
- Biocentricity and economy of scale : hypothesis (and product) testing when wood is a part of an experimental system evaluating durability
XML: View XML