Skip to Main Content
Detectability of Forest Birds from Stationary Points in Northern WisconsinAuthor(s): Amy T. Wolf; Robert W. Howe; Gregory J. Davis
Source: In: Ralph, C. John; Sauer, John R.; Droege, Sam, technical editors. 1995. Monitoring bird populations by point counts. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-149. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station: p. 19-24
Publication Series: General Technical Report (GTR)
Station: Pacific Southwest Research Station
PDF: View PDF (406 KB)
DescriptionEstimation of avian densities from point counts requires information about the distance at which birds can be detected by the observer. Detection distances also are important for designing the spacing of point counts in a regional sampling scheme. We examined the relationship between distance and detectability for forest songbirds in northern Wisconsin. Like previous investigators, we found that some birds can be heard from much greater distances than others. Within the same species, some individuals (or the same individual under different circumstances) can be heard from greater distances than others. In general, this within-site variation in detectability is similar to variation in detectability among individuals in different forest types. Knowledge about the relationship between distance and detectability can be used to approximate the area sampled from a stationary point. This information can then be used to estimate the density of vocalizing birds. Even under ideal field conditions with accurately measured distances, detectability does not follow a simple threshold relationship. On the basis of our empirical data, we use a statistical probit analysis to describe the attenuation of detection with distance; the resulting sigmoidal function can be used to approximate the effective sampling area. Complications arise because individual birds become increasingly difficult to distinguish from conspecifics at greater distances from the observer. Coupled with variation caused by habitat structure, wind conditions, observer bias, and other factors, we conclude that data from point counts can give only a crude picture of avian density. Nevertheless, such estimates might be the best available, and the costs or ambiguities associated with alternative procedures might out- weigh the disadvantages of the point count method.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationWolf, Amy T.; Howe, Robert W.; Davis, Gregory J. 1995. Detectability of Forest Birds from Stationary Points in Northern Wisconsin. In: Ralph, C. John; Sauer, John R.; Droege, Sam, technical editors. 1995. Monitoring bird populations by point counts. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-149. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station: p. 19-24
- Fixed-Radius Point Counts in Forests: Factors Influencing Effectiveness and Efficiency
- A variable circular-plot method for estimating bird numbers
- Statistical approaches to the analysis of point count data: a little extra information can go a long way
XML: View XML