Skip to Main Content
Forest inventory and stratified estimation: a cautionary noteAuthor(s): John Coulston
Source: Res. Note SRS-16. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. 8 p.
Publication Series: Research Note (RN)
Station: Southern Research Station
PDF: View PDF (1.59 MB)
DescriptionThe Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Program uses stratified estimation techniques to produce estimates of forest attributes. Stratification must be unbiased and stratification procedures should be examined to identify any potential bias. This note explains simple techniques for identifying potential bias, discriminating between sample bias and stratification bias, and determining the magnitude of the effect of stratification bias on forest area estimates. The key recommendation is that checks and balances should be incorporated into the FIA processing system to reduce the likelihood of bias caused by stratification.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationCoulston, John. 2008. Forest inventory and stratified estimation: a cautionary note. Res. Note SRS-16. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. 8 p.
Keywordsbias, FIA, national land cover dataset, photointerpretation, proportional allocation
- A statistically valid method for using FIA plots to guide spectral class rejection in producing stratification maps
- A primer of nonresponse in the US Forest Inventory and Analysis program
- Stratifying to reduce bias caused by high nonresponse rates: A case study from New Mexico’s forest inventory
XML: View XML