Skip to Main Content
Due to a lapse in federal funding, this USDA website will not be actively updated. Once funding has been reestablished, online operations will continue.
Experimental method to account for structural compliance in nanoindentation measurementsAuthor(s): Joseph E. Jakes; Charles R. Frihart; James F. Beecher; Robert J. Moon; D. S. Stone
Source: Journal of materials research. Vol. 23, no. 4 (Apr. 2008): Pages 1113-1127.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (1.0 MB)
DescriptionThe standard Oliver–Pharr nanoindentation analysis tacitly assumes that the specimen is structurally rigid and that it is both semi-infinite and homogeneous. Many specimens violate these assumptions. We show that when the specimen flexes or possesses heterogeneities, such as free edges or interfaces between regions of different properties, artifacts arise in the standard analysis that affect the measurement of hardness modulus. The origin of these artifacts is a structural compliance (Cs), which adds to the machine compliance (Cm), but unlike the latter, Cs can vary as a function of position within the specimen. We have developed an experimental approach to isolate and remove Cs. The utility of the method is demonstrated using specimens including (i) a silicon beam, which flexes because it is supported only at the ends, (ii) sites near the free edge of a fused silica calibration standard, (iii) the tracheid walls in unembedded loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), and (iv) the polypropylene matrix in a polypropylene–wood composite.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationJakes, Joseph E.; Frihart, Charles R.; Beecher, James F.; Moon, Robert J.; Stone, D. S. 2008. Experimental method to account for structural compliance in nanoindentation measurements. Journal of materials research. Vol. 23, no. 4 (Apr. 2008): Pages 1113-1127.
KeywordsElasticity, thermoplastic composites, composite materials, mechanical properties, wood-plastic composites, fiber-reinforced plastics, mechanical properties, polypropylene, nanotechnology, nanostructured materials, measurement, microstructure, plant cell walls, hardness, silicon, modulus of elasticity, tracheids, nanoindentation, wood-plastic materials
- Nanoindentation near the edge
- Accounting for structural compliance in nanoindentation measurements of bioceramic bone scaffolds
- Instrumented impact testing of kenaf fiber reinforced polypropylene composites: effects of temperature and composition
XML: View XML