Skip to Main Content
The evaluation of meta-analysis techniques for quantifying prescribed fire effects on fuel loadings.Author(s): Karen E. Kopper; Donald McKenzie; David L. Peterson
Source: Res. Pap. PNW-RP-582. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 24 p.
Publication Series: Research Paper (RP)
Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
View PDF (3.24 MB)
DescriptionModels and effect-size metrics for meta-analysis were compared in four separate meta-analyses quantifying surface fuels after prescribed fires in ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws.) forests of the Western United States. An aggregated data set was compiled from eight published reports that contained data from 65 fire treatment units. Downed woody and organic fuels were partitioned into five classes, and four meta-analyses were performed on each in a 2 by 2 factorial combination of fixed-effects vs. mixed-effects models with a difference-based metric (Hedges’ d) vs. a ratio-based metric (log-response ratio). All analyses yielded significant effect sizes for each class of fuels, although mixed-effects models had larger confidence intervals around mean effect sizes and smaller ranges in those means. The use of multiple methods produced a robust result for this study, but also carries the danger of selective interpretation if results are contradictory. Meta analysis in fire research merits further consideration because it facilitates inferences across data sets reported by multiple authors, even when reporting is inconsistent. Nevertheless, standardized methodology, consistent measurement protocols, and complete reporting of both significant and nonsignificant results will greatly assist future synthesis efforts using metaanalysis.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationKopper, Karen E.; McKenzie, Donald; Peterson, David L. 2009. The evaluation of meta-analysis techniques for quantifying prescribed fire effects on fuel loadings. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-582. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 24 p.
KeywordsEffect size, fuel treatment, Hedges’ d, log-response ratio, mixed-effects model.
- Effects of low intensity prescribed fires on ponderosa pine forests in wilderness areas of Zion National Park, Utah
- Latent resilience in ponderosa pine forest: effects of resumed frequent fire
- Use of Fouler Transforms to define landscape scales of analysis for disturbances: A case study of thinned and unthinned forest stands
XML: View XML