Skip to Main Content
Geographic approaches to biodiversity conservation: implications of scale and error to landscape planningAuthor(s): Curtis H. Flather; Kenneth R. Wilson; Susan A. Shriner
Source: In: Millspaugh, J.J.; Thompson, F.R., III, eds. Models for planning wildlife conservation in large landscapes. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Inc.: 85-121.
Publication Series: Book Chapter
PDF: View PDF (476.0 KB)
DescriptionConservation science is concerned with understanding why distribution and abundance patterns of species vary in time and space. Although these patterns have strong signatures tied to the availability of energy and nutrients, variation in climate, physiographic heterogeneity, and differences in the structural complexity of natural vegetation, it is becoming more difficult to ignore the role that humans play in shaping the composition of species assemblages across landscapes (Gaston 2006). The amount of net primary productivity that goes directly to support humans has become a common, if not contentious, measure of the human footprint on ecosystems. Mean estimates of the proportion of total terrestrial net primary productivity that is appropriated by humans range from 25-40% (Vitousek et al. 1986, Rojstaczer et al. 2001, Imhoff et al. 2004), and the more that is co-opted by humans, the less there is available to support other species (Haberl et al. 2002, Gaston et al. 2003). Although these estimates have low precision (Haberl et al. 2002), there is widespread agreement that human impacts on ecosystems are substantial and growing (Laurance 2001,Wackernagel et al. 2002, Palmer et al. 2004).
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationFlather, Curtis H.; Wilson, Kenneth R.; Shriner, Susan A. 2009. Geographic approaches to biodiversity conservation: implications of scale and error to landscape planning. In: Millspaugh, J.J.; Thompson, F.R., III, eds. Models for planning wildlife conservation in large landscapes. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Inc.: 85-121.
Keywordsbiodiversity conservation, landscape planning
- Ecosystem services from forested landscapes: an overview
- National land-cover pattern data
- Past and future patterns of freshwater mussel extinctions in North America during the Holocene
XML: View XML