Skip to Main Content
Reply to discussion: ground water response to forest harvest: implications or hillslope stabilityAuthor(s): Amod Dhakal; Roy C. Sidle; A.C. Johnson; R.T. Edwards
Source: Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 44(4): 1062-1066
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
PDF: View PDF (172.11 KB)
DescriptionDhakal and Sidle (this volume) have requested clarification of some of the rationales and approaches used in analyses described by Johnson et al. (2007). Here we further describe hydrologic conditions typical of southeast Alaska and elaborate on an accepted methodology used for conducting analysis of covariance statistical analysis (ANCOVA). We discuss Dhakal and Sidle's four main criticisms, namely (1) use of process-based knowledge, (2) use of 48-h storms, (3) utilization of statistical results, and (4) hillslope stability modeling.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationDhakal, Amod; Sidle, Roy C.; Johnson, A.C.; Edwards, R.T. 2008. Reply to discussion: ground water response to forest harvest: implications or hillslope stability. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 44(4): 1062-1066
- Design and analysis for thematic map accuracy assessment: Fundamental principles
- Northeastern Regional Forest Fragmentation Assessment: Rationale, Methods, and Comparisons With Other Studies
- A Tool for Estimating Variability in Wood Preservative Treatment Retention
XML: View XML