Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Ian P. Conradie; W. Dale Greene; Glen E. Murphy
    Date: 2003
    Source: In: 2nd Forest Engineering Conference 10p.
    Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
    PDF: View PDF  (1.79 MB)


    Cut-to-Iength is not the harvesting system of choice in the southeastern USA although it is perceived to be more environmentally friendly and to have the ability to recover more value from cut stems. In this paper we address the value recovery aspect of harvesters by comparing the optimal recoverable value, as calculated by optimization software, to the actual value recovered by the harvesters at three sites. The actual values recovered at the sites were respectively 93, 90 and 94%. At all the sites the harvesters tended to cut fewer but longer logs than the op~al solution suggested.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Conradie, Ian P.; Greene, W. Dale; Murphy, Glen E. 2003. Value recovery with harvesters in southeastern USA pine stands. In: 2nd Forest Engineering Conference 10p.


    Harvester, value recovery, optimization, AVIS

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page