Skip to Main Content
Hands beat machines for collecting native seedAuthor(s): Mary Ann Davies; Scott Jensen
Source: Restoration and Nurseries Tech Tips 0824 2353. Missoula, MT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Missoula Technology and Development Center. Online: http://www.fs.fed.us/t-d/pubs/htmlpubs/htm08242353/index.htm
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (899.23 KB)
DescriptionA hedge trimmer (Garden Groom Pro) and a hand-held vacuum (Euro-Pro Shark) were tested to determine whether they might be more effective for collecting the seed of native plants than common hand methods. The common hand methods worked best.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationDavies, Mary Ann; Jensen, Scott. 2008. Hands beat machines for collecting native seed. Restoration and Nurseries Tech Tips 0824 2353. Missoula, MT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Missoula Technology and Development Center. Online: http://www.fs.fed.us/t-d/pubs/htmlpubs/htm08242353/index.htm
Keywordsequipment, evaluations, restoration, trimmers, vacuums
- Managing wilderness recreation use: common problems and potential solutions
- A critical analysis of methods for rapid and nondestructive determination of wood density in standing trees
- Evaluation of two techniques for quantification of hyphal biomass
XML: View XML