A comparison of sampling methods for a standing tree acoustic deviceAuthor(s): Jerry M. Mahon, Jr.; Lewis Jordan; Lawrence R. Schimleck; Alexander Clark, III; Richard F. Daniels
Source: Journal article Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 33(2): 62-68.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Southern Research Station
PDF: View PDF (561.98 KB)
One method of evaluating potential product performance is the use of acoustic tools for identifying trees with high stiffness. Acoustic velocities for 100 standing loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) trees, obtained with the transmitting and receiving probes placed on the same face and opposite faces, were compared. Significant differences in velocity between the two methods were found, with velocity determined using the opposite-face method generally dependent on stem diameter, or the amount of wood through which the stress wave must pass. The only opposite-face method in which the velocities did not vary with dbh was for an assumed flight path where the stress wave traveled from the transmitting probe around the circumference of the stem in the outerwood and then down longitudinally to the receiving probe. Variation in velocities from hit-to-hit was 62% less using the opposite-face method compared with the same-face method. It is recommended to use the circumferential opposite-face (Vel_OC) calculation when determining stress wave velocity for a standing tree.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationMahon Jr., Jerry M.; Jordan, Lewis; Schimleck, Lawrence R.; Clark III, Alexander; Daniels, Richard F. 2009. A comparison of sampling methods for a standing tree acoustic device. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 33(2): 62-68.
Keywordsacoustic velocity, analysis of covariance, loblolly pine, time of flight, TreeSonic
Relationships between acoustic variables and different measures of stiffness in standing Pinus taeda trees
- Acoustic evaluation of loblolly pine tree- and lumber-length logs allows for segregation of lumber modulus of elasticity, not for modulus of rupture
- Acoustic evaluation of wood quality in standing trees. Part I, Acoustic wave behavior
XML: View XML