Skip to Main Content
A relatively nonrestrictive approach to reducing campsite impact: Caney Creek Wilderness, ArkansasAuthor(s): David N. Cole; Thomas E. Ferguson
Source: International Journal of Wilderness. 15(1): 20-25.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (862.73 KB)
DescriptionAn excessive number of highly impacted campsites led managers of the Caney Creek Wilderness to attempt to reduce campsite impacts with a program of trail relocation, education, closure of selected campsites, and site restoration. The strategy involved increasing the concentration of use somewhat, without resorting to the restrictiveness of a designated campsite policy. To assess success, all campsites in the wilderness were inventoried in 1994 and their condition was assessed. A subsequent reassessment of campsites, in 2007, indicated the management program was highly successful. The total number of campsites was reduced by 40% and the number of highly impacted campsites declined substantially.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationCole, David N.; Ferguson, Thomas E. 2009. A relatively nonrestrictive approach to reducing campsite impact: Caney Creek Wilderness, Arkansas. International Journal of Wilderness. 15(1): 20-25.
Keywordscampsite impact, Caney Creek Wilderness
- Wilderness campsite conditions under an unregulated camping policy: An eastern example
- Effectiveness of a confinement strategy in reducing pack stock impacts at campsites in the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness, Idaho
- Changing conditions on wilderness campsites: Seven case studies of trends over 13 to 32 years
XML: View XML