Skip to Main Content
Due to a lapse in federal funding, this USDA website will not be actively updated. Once funding has been reestablished, online operations will continue.
A relatively nonrestrictive approach to reducing campsite impact: Caney Creek Wilderness, ArkansasAuthor(s): David N. Cole; Thomas E. Ferguson
Source: International Journal of Wilderness. 15(1): 20-25.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (862.73 KB)
DescriptionAn excessive number of highly impacted campsites led managers of the Caney Creek Wilderness to attempt to reduce campsite impacts with a program of trail relocation, education, closure of selected campsites, and site restoration. The strategy involved increasing the concentration of use somewhat, without resorting to the restrictiveness of a designated campsite policy. To assess success, all campsites in the wilderness were inventoried in 1994 and their condition was assessed. A subsequent reassessment of campsites, in 2007, indicated the management program was highly successful. The total number of campsites was reduced by 40% and the number of highly impacted campsites declined substantially.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationCole, David N.; Ferguson, Thomas E. 2009. A relatively nonrestrictive approach to reducing campsite impact: Caney Creek Wilderness, Arkansas. International Journal of Wilderness. 15(1): 20-25.
Keywordscampsite impact, Caney Creek Wilderness
- Wilderness campsite conditions under an unregulated camping policy: An eastern example
- Effectiveness of a confinement strategy in reducing pack stock impacts at campsites in the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness, Idaho
- Changing conditions on wilderness campsites: Seven case studies of trends over 13 to 32 years
XML: View XML