Skip to Main Content
Do recreation motivations and wilderness involvement relate to support for wilderness management? A segmentation analysisAuthor(s): Troy E. Hall; Erin Seekamp; David Cole
Source: Leisure Science. 32: 109-124.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (219.05 KB)
DescriptionSurveys show relatively little support for use restrictions to protect wilderness experiences. However, such conclusions based on aggregate data could hide important differences among visitors. Visitors with more wilderness-dependent trip motives were hypothesized to be more supportive of use restrictions. Using survey data from visitors to 13 wildernesses, cluster analysis of motivations and wilderness involvement generated three clusters that differed in sensitivity to social conditions and support for use restrictions. The group with motives most aligned with the Wilderness Act was slightly more adversely affected by social conditions and more supportive of regulations. However, none of the groups supported use restrictions to protect opportunities for solitude.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationHall, Troy E.; Seekamp, Erin; Cole, David. 2010. Do recreation motivations and wilderness involvement relate to support for wilderness management? A segmentation analysis. Leisure Science. 32: 109-124.
Keywordscluster analysis, solitude, urban-proximate, wilderness experiences, wilderness zoning
- Use patterns and visitor characteristics, attitudes, and preferences in nine wilderness and other roadless areas
- Visitor characteristics and preferences for three National Forest wildernesses in the South
- Wilderness on the internet: identifying wilderness information domains
XML: View XML