Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Lisa J. Bate; Torolf R. Torgersen; Michael J. Wisdom; Edward O. Garton
    Date: 2009
    Source: Forest Ecology and Management doi: 10.1 016/j.foreco.2009.04.042
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    PDF: View PDF  (1.97 MB)

    Description

    Logs are an important structural feature of forest ecosystems, and their abundance affects many resources and forest processes, including fire regimes, soil productivity, silviculture, carbon cycling, and wildlife habitat. Consequently, logs are often sampled to estimate their frequency, percent cover, volume, and weight. The line-intersect method (LIM) is one of the most widely used methods to obtain these estimates and has been shown to produce unbiased estimates of log characteristics. With the traditional LIM the diameters of each log at the point of its intersection with the sampling transect are used to estimate log characteristics. Based on a simulation study and a large set of empirical data, we found that use of intersect log diameters to define size classes provided biased estimates of log characteristics. The bias varied by diameter class. Results from the simulation study showed that log frequency and volume were overestimated in small-diameter log classes and underestimated in large diameter classes. Similarly, results from our empirical analysis showed a 40% overestimate of log volume in the smallest diameter class (15-25 cm), and a 31% underestimate of volume in the largest diameter class (>50 cm). Just as size classes of snags and trees are best defined by their diameter-at breast height (DBH), size classes of logs should be defined by their large-end diameters (LEOs). When large-end diameters of logs were used instead of diameters measured at the point of transect intersection, bias was substantially reduced or eliminated. These results indicate that line-intersect sampling could be substantially improved by including measurements of LEOs to estimate log characteristics. Our results have far-reaching implications for estimates of log characteristics, such as estimates of fuel loading and subsequent wildfire risk, carbon source and sink dynamics, silviculture, nutrient cycling, and habitat for wildlife. Without our suggested correction to line-intersect sampling, many forest resources associated with log characteristics will not be estimated accurately, affecting a plethora of log-based management and research programs.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to pnw_pnwpubs@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Bate, Lisa J.; Torgersen, Torolf R.; Wisdom, Michael J.; Garton, Edward O. 2009. Biased estimation of forest log characteristics using intersect diameters. Forest Ecology and Management. 258: 635-640.

    Keywords

    coarse woody debris, down woody material, fuel management, logs, intersect diameter, line-intersect sampling, silviculture, wildlife

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page