Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

 Due to a lapse in federal funding, this USDA website will not be actively updated. Once funding has been reestablished, online operations will continue.


  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Ted Bilek
    Date: 2008
    Source: General Technical Report FPL-GTR-178. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 15 pages
    Publication Series: General Technical Report (GTR)
    Station: Forest Products Laboratory
    PDF: View PDF  (991.0 KB)

    Description

    ChargeOut!, a discounted cash-flow methodology in spreadsheet format for analyzing machine costs, is compared with traditional machine-rate methodologies. Four machine-rate models are compared and a common data set representative of logging skidders’ costs is used to illustrate the differences between ChargeOut! and the machine-rate methods. The study found that the machine-rate methodologies were not standardized and the methodologies had differences in accounting for ownership, other fixed costs, and variable operating costs. The result was that two of the machine-rate models calculated hourly rates that were higher than needed to provide the specified return on capital, and two of the machine-rate models calculated hourly rates that were insufficient to provide the specified return. In contrast, ChargeOut!’s break-even rate returned exactly the specified return. Differences between the results calculated by the machine-rate methods occur because of different implicit assumptions used within the models’ formulas, largely because the machine-rate models are unable to properly incorporate the time value of money. Whereas ChargeOut! can be sufficiently constrained to approximately replicate a machine-rate calculation, doing so sacrifices much of ChargeOut!’s power and flexibility. Machine-rate models cannot be configured to replicate ChargeOut!’s calculations. Machine-rate models cannot be configured to calculate cash flows, allow for uneven costs or machine hours, incorporate loans that have a different life than the expected machine life, or perform an after-tax analysis. ChargeOut! can do all of these.

    Supporting material is available in an Excel spreadsheet. http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fpl_gtr178_chargeout.xls

    Publication Notes

    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Bilek, Ted. 2008. ChargeOut! : discounted cash flow compared with traditional machine-rate analysis. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-178. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 15 pages

    Cited

    Google Scholar

    Keywords

    Logging, machinery, costs, data processing, industrial equipment, discounted cash flow, break-even analysis, charge-out rate, capital equipment costing, machine rate, depreciation, inflation, discounted cash flow analysis

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/35057