Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Phil Mitchell; Robert Russell Hurst
    Date: 2009
    Source: General Technical Report FPL-GTR-188. Madison, WI: USDA, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 51 pages.
    Publication Series: General Technical Report (GTR)
    Station: Forest Products Laboratory
    PDF: View PDF  (5.0 MB)

    Description

    This report provides an assessment of technology used in manufacturing modular homes in the United States, and that used in the German prefabricated wooden home industry. It is the first step toward identifying the research needs in automation and manufacturing methods that will facilitate mass customization in the home manufacturing industry. Within the United States, a relatively low level of technology was found in domestic modular home manufacturers. Raw material transportation was mostly manual; manually operated saws sized raw materials; cranes were used to move subassemblies, and modules were pushed by hand or with a battery-powered pusher. German prefabricated home manufacturers used closed panels to construct walls, roofs, and floors rather than modular construction. Three levels of automation were identified: manual, semi-automated, and fully automated. Manual production methods were similar to those found in the United States. In semi-automated factories, automated machinery was used, but an operator was required to manually load, unload, and start the machine. The fully automated factories had equipment capable of machining and transferring panel components and placing and fastening components together. Such investment in automation is risky in the cyclic housing industry. The modular factory has elevated homebuilding from a craft to mass production, but flexibility is reduced and significant customization is difficult. Future research should examine the cost ef-fectiveness of using high levels of automation, software, and equipment in the U.S. homebuilding industry and whether it can profitably provide the manufacturing flexibility for mass customization. Alternatively, the use of lean manufacturing in modular home factories to realize the same benefits needs to be examined.

    Publication Notes

    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Mitchell, Phil; Hurst, Robert Russell. 2009. Technology assessment of automation trends in the modular home industry. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-188. Madison, WI: USDA, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 51 pages.

    Cited

    Google Scholar

    Keywords

    Stick-built, automation trends, modular home industry, wood-frame housing, factory built housing, home prefabrication, closed-wall panels, systems-built housing, prefabricated houses, design, construction, automation, modular construction industry

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/35058