Skip to Main Content
Mapping wildland fuels and forest structure for land management: a comparison of nearest neighbor imputation and other methodsAuthor(s): Kenneth B. Pierce; Janet L. Ohmann; Michael C. Wimberly; Matthew J. Gregory; Jeremy S. Fried
Source: Canadian Journal of Forestry Research. 39: 1901-1916
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
View PDF (3.17 MB)
DescriptionLand managers need consistent information about the geographic distribution of wildland fuels and forest structure over large areas to evaluate fire risk and plan fuel treatments. We compared spatial predictions for 12 fuel and forest structure variables across three regions in the western United States using gradient nearest neighbor (GNN) imputation, linear models (LMs), classification and regression trees (CART), and geostatistical methods (kriging and universal kriging (UK)). Local-scale map accuracy varied considerably across sites, variables, and methods. GNN performed best for forest structure variables in Oregon, but LMs and UK were better for canopy variables and for forest structure variables in Washington and California. Kriging performed poorly throughout, and kriging did not improve prediction accuracy when added to LMs as UK. GNN outperformed CART in predicting vegetation classes and fuel models, complex variables defined by multiple attributes. Regional distributions of vegetation classes and fuel models were accurately represented by GNN and very poorly by CART and LMs. Despite their often limited accuracy at the local scale, GNN maps are useful when information on a wide range of forest attributes is needed for analysis and forest management at intermediate, i.e., landscape to ecoregional, scales.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationPierce, Kenneth B., Jr.; Ohmann, Janet L.; Wimberly, Michael C.; Gregory, Matthew J.; Fried, Jeremy S. 2009. Mapping wildland fuels and forest structure for land management: a comparison of nearest neighbor imputation and other methods. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research. 39: 1901-1916.
Keywordsmapping, wildland, fires, forest structure, fire risk, fuel treatments, GNN, LMs, CART
- Comparing five modelling techniques for predicting forest characteristics
- Influence of lidar, Landsat imagery, disturbance history, plot location accuracy, and plot size on accuracy of imputation maps of forest composition and structure
- Integration of lidar and Landsat ETM+ data for estimating and mapping forest canopy height.
XML: View XML