Skip to Main Content
Forest treatment residues for thermal energy compared with disposal by onsite burning: Emissions and energy returnAuthor(s): Greg Jones; Dan Loeffler; David Calkin; Woodam Chung
Source: Biomass and Bioenergy. 34(5): 737-746.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: Download Publication (522.67 KB)
DescriptionMill residues from forest industries are the source for most of the current wood-based energy in the US, approximately 2.1% of the nation's energy use in 2007. Forest residues from silvicultural treatments, which include limbs, tops, and small non-commercial trees removed for various forest management objectives, represent an additional source of woody biomass for energy. We spatially analyzed collecting, grinding, and hauling forest residue biomass on a 515,900 ha area in western Montana, US, to compare the total emissions of burning forest residues in a boiler for thermal energy with the alternatives of onsite disposal by pile-burning and using either natural gas or #2 distillate oil to produce the equivalent amount of useable energy. When compared to the pile-burn/fossil fuel alternatives, carbon dioxide emissions from the bioenergy alternative were approximately 60%, methane emissions were approximately 3%, and particulate emissions less than 10 mm were 11% and 41%, respectively, for emission control and no-control boilers. Emissions from diesel consumption for collecting, grinding, and hauling biomass represented less than 5% of the total bioenergy emissions at an average haul distance of 136 km. Across the study area, an average 21 units of bioenergy were produced for each unit of diesel energy used to collect, grind, and haul biomass. Fossil fuel energy saved by the bioenergy alternative relative to the pile-burn/fossil fuel alternatives averaged 14.7-15.2 GJ t-1 of biomass.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationJones, Greg; Loeffler, Dan; Calkin, David; Chung, Woodam. 2010. Forest treatment residues for thermal energy compared with disposal by onsite burning: Emissions and energy return. Biomass and Bioenergy. 34(5): 737-746.
Keywordsbiomass energy, bioenergy, emissions, carbon emissions, greenhouse gases, GHG, logging residues, woody biomass, forestry
- Emissions, energy return and economics from utilizing forest residues for thermal energy compared to onsite pile burning
- Forest biomass diversion in the Sierra Nevada: Energy, economics and emissions
- What pollutes more: Burning logging scraps on-site or hauling them to boilers?
XML: View XML