Skip to Main Content
A comparative analysis of mail and internet surveysAuthor(s): Benjamin D. Poole; David K. Loomis
Source: In: Watts, Clifton E., Jr.; Fisher, Cherie LeBlanc, eds. Proceedings of the 2009 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-66. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 231-234.
Publication Series: General Technical Report - Proceedings
Station: Northern Research Station
PDF: View PDF (159.14 KB)
DescriptionTh e field of survey research is constantly evolving with the introduction of new technologies. Each new mini-revolution brings criticism about the accuracy of the new survey method. The latest development in the survey research field has been increased reliance on Internet surveys. This paper compares data collected through a mixed-mode (mail and Internet) survey of Zuma Beach users in Malibu, CA, focusing on differences in response rate and in responses to questions between the two modes. Two-sample t-tests were performed on each variable to determine differences between the modes. These tests found 15 significant differences in responses to demographic variables, scale items, and Likert items. The format of questions is discussed as a possible explanation for some of these differences in responses.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationPoole, Benjamin D.; Loomis, David K. 2010. A comparative analysis of mail and internet surveys. In: Watts, Clifton E., Jr.; Fisher, Cherie LeBlanc, eds. Proceedings of the 2009 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-66. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 231-234.
- Cost and performance tradeoffs between mail and internet survey modes in a nonmarket valuation study
- Does Question Format Matter? Valuing an Endangered Species
- Approaches to, and perceived benefits of, training in the secondary wood industry
XML: View XML